Last year, an independent watchdog expressed concerns of fraudulent activities tied to President Joe Biden’s initial student loan forgiveness proposal.
The non-partisan Government Accountability Office reported that when the Education Department granted approval to 16 million borrowers for student debt relief, normal fraud prevention measures were not fully applied. The independent watchdog made this conclusion in its report that was published last Thursday.
Had the student loan forgiveness plan been implemented, it could have cleared about $400 billion in education-related debt. Unfortunately, the proposal was stopped by a conservative majority in the Supreme Court. The decision to block the initiative resulted in an opportunity for undeserving borrowers to benefit from the program, the auditors argued.
The watchmen emphasized the need for strong fraud risk management to be a staple in any future program.
Although the report may strengthen the argument of opponents to President Biden’s student debt relief plan, the administration is eyeing relief from the nearly $2 trillion student debt crisis that currently afflicts Americans.
One of the primary issues addressed in the watchdog’s report was the possibility of fraudulent self-reported incomes by some borrowers. This concern was raised because the program granted student debt relief without fully verifying the self-reported incomes of the beneficiaries.
Contents
Fraud Prevention Measures Were Mischaracterized – Education Department Responds to GAO Audit
The Education Department downplayed the issues highlighted in the report.
In an Oct. 16 letter signed by Richard Cordray, the head of Federal Student Aid program, the department suggested that even in a worst-case scenario, the rate of fraudulent applications would have been less than 1%.
Cordray stated that the department’s fraud risk management strategy’s implementation being labeled as incomplete was an unfair representation of its efforts.
The auditors recommended that future loan relief efforts not be based solely on self-reported data. They further urged the Education Department to put in place all risk management stages before implementing any new relief plan.
Although the department agreed with these suggestions on the whole, it pointed out that the program was designed with a very low risk of fraud in mind. They argued that the program targeted a demographic that was familiar to the department, and focused on loan relief rather than cash incentives.
The inquiry into the program was conducted by the GAO spokesperson Chuck Young. However, unlike some other audits, the initiative to review the program was not requested by Congress but was of interest for the integrity of the program.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the fraud issue linked to the initial student loan forgiveness proposal by Biden’s Administration?
The fraud issue was linked to the absence of standard fraud prevention measures when approving borrowers for student debt relief. This could have potentially allowed undeserving borrowers to benefit from the scheme based on fraudulent data.
What was the primary concern pointed out by the watchdog’s report?
The primary concern highlighted in the report was the potential for fraudulent self-reported incomes. The debt relief program did not fully verify the incomes of the borrowers before granting relief, which could have allowed fraudulent claimants to benefit.
What recommendations were given by the auditors for future loan relief efforts?
For future loan relief plans, the auditors recommended avoiding reliance on self-reported data. They also suggested that the Education Department should fully implement all aspects of its risk management plan prior to embarking on any other relief mission.